thehefner: (Batman: I Am The Night)
thehefner ([personal profile] thehefner) wrote2010-12-04 04:19 pm

(Hugo) Strange "Batman 3" rumors

Note: I figure there are a couple people interested in the new Batman film here who also don't read [livejournal.com profile] about_faces, which is where I usually now post all my Bat-fan stuff. Just trying to make your skimming easier, my non-comic-reading friends!



So, a couple weeks ago, I finally started a fan project wherein I looked at every single appearance of Hugo Strange, Batman's first arch-nemesis and Moriarty equivalent.

In my first post, I expressed my belief that one of Hugo's most famous appearances--1990's Batman: Prey, by Doug Moench and Paul Gulacy, one of the best Batman stories ever--would make an absolutely perfect basis for Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight Rises. Just pump up Catwoman's role as an origin, and boom, you have a great film that is pure Batman while not being in the shadow of Heath. Pure fantasy on my part, you understand. I figured and still do figure that Nolan wouldn't do that, because Prey and Hugo are just not well known to anyone but the most hardcore Bat-fans. Far as I know, I'm the only one to have this idea.

Literally days after I said that, rumors started popping up saying that Prey actually WILL be the basis for TDKR. In fact, aintitcool.com, which usually avoids most of the 99%-bogus sea of Bat-rumors, just ran a story today with a source claiming that it'll be Prey plus Clayface (wha? How the hell would that work? And Clayface? This guy is so rigid in his "realism" that he can't imagine using the frickin' Penguin, much less someone like Mr. Freeze! No way would he use Clayface unless it was original Basil Karlo without powers), which still sounds bogus to me.

But damn, this is nuts. Did I inadvertently start this rumor by someone reading that scans_daily post and spreading that idea around as truth? With s_d's readership of a couple thousand people, I suppose it's not beyond the realm of internet possibility. More likely, I probably wasn't the only one to remember that beloved but little-known (and long out-of-print!) storyline, and make the connection to Nolan's films. Or, just as likely, it's just a weird damn coincidence.

Tangent: Heh, Henchgirl's actually hoping that Hugo won't be in it. Not because she doesn't like Hugo, but because she fears it'll ruin the character in fandom, much like Spider-Man 2 ruined Doctor Octopus in fandom. Seriously, try to find anything about Otto, and it's all Movie!Otto. And while I absolutely adore Movie!Otto as one of the best takes on the character, these fans clearly have never and will never read a comic in their lives. You can't talk with them about anything, because the adapted version dominates and obliterates all stories that created it. It's very frustrating.

Either way, hopefully it'll encourage people to get interested in the character of Hugo Strange. If you'd like, please feel free to check out the three Hugo posts I've done so far on [livejournal.com profile] about_faces:

Part 1: The original Golden Age Hugo Strange trilogy, wherein his Moriarty influence is very apparent, and the character lays the foundation for subsequent villains like the Joker and Scarecrow later on.


Part 2: Hugo's return subplot in Strange Apparitions, one of the greatest Batman stories ever. It kills me that I had to edit out all the other great stuff from that whole story, including most of the Joker epic, "The Laughing Fish."


Part 3: the obscure Bronze Age classic, Interlude on Earth-Two, by Alan Brennert, a writer who I'm increasingly read to consider one of the best DC authors of all time, even though he only wrote nine stories, most of them just single issues. He deserves the Alan Moore treatment of getting a Complete DC Stories collection for tales like this one.


I have about seven more Hugo stories to come, particularly Prey. That's the greatest of those to come, but I have to work my way up, as every single Hugo story is directly influenced by the ones that preceded it. He's a character who seems to get dusted off and brought back only by the most hardcore, dedicated Batman writers, the ones who've read and clearly remembered his every single appearance, which I think speaks to what makes this character so great and essential to Batman.

So yeah. I don't think the Prey-for-Dark-Knight-Rises rumor is true, and I don't know if I'd want it to be. I've kind of liked Hugo as being a private joy shared by a handful of Batman fans and writers. But if they can do him justice, hell, maybe he'll finally get the status that geeks like me have known he's deserved for... well, seventy years.

[identity profile] skalja.livejournal.com 2010-12-04 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
You can't talk with them about anything, because the adapted version dominates and obliterates all stories that created it. It's very frustrating.

Hasn't this happened with all of the Spidey characters who appeared in the film? Except for JJJ and Aunt May, who hew very close to their original counterparts.

[identity profile] thehefner.livejournal.com 2010-12-04 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd imagine so! I've known people who thought that Eddie Brock was always a skinny kid, for example. At least the Norman Osborn fans have their own character so front and center in Marvel U these days, so Movie!Gobby isn't totally dominating fandom. I don't think. Unlike poor Otto. Also, Heath!Joker is the only Joker for many, many fans. I don't begrudge them their favorite, I just wish they'd broaden their horizons, y'know? I wish there wouldn't be more than a handful of people I could talk with about "The Laughing Fish."

But hey, at least JJJ is timeless and accessible either way. So it's certainly possible!

Honestly, I think this is just a part of how increasingly fragmented fandom has become in general. I'm not sure how that happened, exactly, but that's the way things are, and--according to some--it's something people will need to deal with and capitalize upon if comics are to endure. For now, I just kinda feel out of place.

[identity profile] skalja.livejournal.com 2010-12-04 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I think the only reason comics!Osborn has held his own against movie!Osborn is that movie Osborn was really only in the first movie (apart from a bit of creepy voice over), which is almost ten years old, whereas comics!Osborn has been busy lately. But really, movie!fandom combined with the smaller but sizeable minority of cartoon!fandom probably dominates comics!fandom by ... a factor of ten, at least.

Has fandom really gotten that fragmented? I mean, I think people in our age range remember an unfragmented fandom from the early internet days simply because there was so litte fannish stuff (or any stuff) on the internet that everyone banded together. But before that there were fen who could only communicate through zines, letters, occasional con meetings ... it's just that now, we can see what we're missing because it's all broadcast.