I just read the first volume of Scott Pilgrim. Now, maybe I need to read the second to see just why it is that everyone, and I mean it really feels like *everyone*, is so frickin' orgasming over this comic. Beacause what is the frickin' DEAL, people?!
Page Summary
kosher-jenny.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kali921.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kali921.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kosher-jenny.livejournal.com - (no subject)
thehefner.livejournal.com - (no subject)
thehefner.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kali921.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kali921.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kali921.livejournal.com - (no subject)
thehefner.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kali921.livejournal.com - (no subject)
little-dinosaur.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kosher-jenny.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kosher-jenny.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pondering-duck.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 05:32 pm (UTC)What, pray tell, is it?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 05:32 pm (UTC)Hi!
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 05:37 pm (UTC)*waves back*
Nice to see that I comment enough in that comm to register as familiar. Of course, I should probably find some scans to post...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 05:39 pm (UTC)Then again, you're talking to the guy who seriously does *not* get why people are completely totally orgasming themselves over FIREFLY, a show I liked... but dude, I don't get it.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 05:56 pm (UTC)Also, I'm stalking our mutual friend here. Apparently I'm not a very good stalker, because he's noticed me.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 05:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 06:01 pm (UTC)If there hadn't been so much hype, I'd have thought it was fun and light, nothing more.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 06:45 pm (UTC)I repeat, Gert is a snot.
See? You are not alone in your grumbliness.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 06:51 pm (UTC)I also didn't like "Blankets", though. Comics about how smart and poetical and underappreciated their creators are just don't do it for me. I prefer the "Action! Splode!" school of indie comics.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 09:30 pm (UTC)Ooh! Why, thank you! Most of that's probably a bit of a bluff though, as I'm terribly n00bish when it comes to American comics. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 10:00 pm (UTC)The more you try to push people onto something by declaring it the second coming of [insert really really good thing here] you're probably stand a greater chance of putting them off rather than making them fans. The same thing happened to me with Transmet. I kept hearing about how omgamazinggasm it was that by the time I got around to reading it I don't think I could have been anything except disappointed. Compare that to a series like Planetary, or Preacher which I picked up and fell hard for after reading a loy-key S_D post where the posters just let the comics speak for themselves. I'd rather people just give me the gist of something and let me make my own mind, you know?
Of course, sometimes I can put myself in a very "do as I say, not as I do" situation with these things. I understand the feeling of finding something that you think is totally awesome and omg I must share it with the world! But you risk coming on too strong. Something I learned the hard way when I tried to push V for Vendetta on my American comic-disliking friend. Even though it has the key things that she hates about Americomics*, in my misguiding fangirlism I figured that the story was so good, she would just have to like it. Nope, if anything I managed to even further her prejudices against the medium. D'oh.
*Heavy black inks (especially when used for shading) and lots of words/speech bubbles on the page. Yeah. I haven't given up, because I'm confident in comics as a medium that there has to be something for everyone.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 11:12 pm (UTC)