For the love of God, Montressor
Feb. 7th, 2006 12:12 pmY'know what I really hate about remakes? I'm afraid that the remakes will replace the originals. Think that fear is baseless? I was wondering that too until I thought about SCARFACE. The original 1933 SCARFACE is so overshadowed, it's not even being made on VHS anymore, much less DVD. Any new TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE products I see are all based on the utterly inferior remake. They should remake bad movies, movies people want to forget. Not classics, and especially not brilliant classics that the youth of today has probably not seen, much less heard of. Which brings me to my point:
Please. For the love of God. DON'T see the THE PINK PANTHER.
I love Steve Martin, don't get me wrong. THE JERK, LA STORY, and PLANES, TRAINS, AND AUTOMOBILES are all-time favorites. His stand-up work and his writing, brilliant stuff. He is an absolutely brilliant Steve Martin. But he is not Peter Sellers. I shudder to think how many people going to see the remake, Beyonce Knowles fans for example, would go "Who's Peter Sellers?"
Do yourself a huge favor and rent A SHOT IN THE DARK and THE PINK PANTHER STRIKES AGAIN. See the original too as well, but those are the very best of the best Clouseau movies. The remake isn't so much a remake of the original PINK PANTHER; in that, Clouseau was barely a supporting character. It was in those two films especially that he became an icon, and it's those two movies that are being remade and trampled upon. A SHOT IN THE DARK is in my top ten comedies of all time, right alongside LA STORY.
Please, people, stop giving Hollywood money for being unoriginal and trying to profit off of superior movies. Which is not to say that there aren't good remakes; THE FLY and THE THING are absolutely brilliant. And sure, I haven't seen the new PINK PANTHER yet, I guess I can't really judge. But Beyonce? Fucking Beyonce? Come now. And besides, nothing changes this fact:

See that? Clouseau. Accept no substitutes. Not Alan Arkin, not Ted Wass, not Roberto Benigni, and not even Steve Martin.
And while you're at it, also watch (if you haven't already) A FISH CALLED WANDA and LEON: THE PROFESSIONAL to see Kevin Kline and Jean Reno perform for something other than just another paycheck.
Please. For the love of God. DON'T see the THE PINK PANTHER.
I love Steve Martin, don't get me wrong. THE JERK, LA STORY, and PLANES, TRAINS, AND AUTOMOBILES are all-time favorites. His stand-up work and his writing, brilliant stuff. He is an absolutely brilliant Steve Martin. But he is not Peter Sellers. I shudder to think how many people going to see the remake, Beyonce Knowles fans for example, would go "Who's Peter Sellers?"
Do yourself a huge favor and rent A SHOT IN THE DARK and THE PINK PANTHER STRIKES AGAIN. See the original too as well, but those are the very best of the best Clouseau movies. The remake isn't so much a remake of the original PINK PANTHER; in that, Clouseau was barely a supporting character. It was in those two films especially that he became an icon, and it's those two movies that are being remade and trampled upon. A SHOT IN THE DARK is in my top ten comedies of all time, right alongside LA STORY.
Please, people, stop giving Hollywood money for being unoriginal and trying to profit off of superior movies. Which is not to say that there aren't good remakes; THE FLY and THE THING are absolutely brilliant. And sure, I haven't seen the new PINK PANTHER yet, I guess I can't really judge. But Beyonce? Fucking Beyonce? Come now. And besides, nothing changes this fact:

See that? Clouseau. Accept no substitutes. Not Alan Arkin, not Ted Wass, not Roberto Benigni, and not even Steve Martin.
And while you're at it, also watch (if you haven't already) A FISH CALLED WANDA and LEON: THE PROFESSIONAL to see Kevin Kline and Jean Reno perform for something other than just another paycheck.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 05:55 pm (UTC)Cheaper by the Dozen.
Two.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 06:02 pm (UTC)Maybe the same aliens who kidnapped the real Michael Jackson in 1985 and replaced him with the double did the same with Steve Martin after LA Story.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 05:56 pm (UTC)"Hey Bimmin, did you know there was ANOTHER Red Dragon movie? Without Ed Norton?"
To me, it's kind of like saying, "You mean, this was once a book?" >_<;; I agree with you that there are brilliant remakes but really, Hollywood needs a serious injection of originality!
Yeah...remakes....yeah... ;_;
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 06:02 pm (UTC)Man oh man oh GOD. MANHUNTER is another one of my favorites, and RED DRAGON (aside from Ralph Finnes' performance) was a phoned-in paycheck movie for everyone involved. It saddens me to think that MANHUNTER was actually the more faithful adaptation, changed ending and all.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 06:11 pm (UTC)now if only they had edited the rest...
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 06:16 pm (UTC)i wonder if it's a lack of humility of a sorts. clearly he's choosing movies he personally loved, and is remaking them as his own. a lot of actors do that. but something has gone horribly horribly wrong.
i think there have been some very good literature to movie conversions recently. Mirrormask and Sin City both come to mind from last year. and that dnd remake with the ring of power in new zealand, but anyway.
but Clousseau should have been locked away and never tried again.
i'd love to see Hollywood have a Hall of Fame: nothing in the hall can be re-made, unless by another hall of famer. afterall, guilds (writers', actors' and directors') should be responsible for quality control.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 11:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 09:02 pm (UTC)I second my boy's hall-of-fame suggestion. It'd be like retiring the number, only more useful.
Recommended double feature.
Date: 2006-02-08 02:04 am (UTC)Re: Recommended double feature.
Date: 2006-02-08 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-08 02:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-08 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-12 10:52 am (UTC)i was thinking about "a fish called wanda" the other day, because i was hanging out with my friends, which i do every day, and they are these 6 italian people (aside from one american, and one hungarian who sounds SO like dracula, all my friends are italian, how strange) buuuut, anyway, italian people are not so good with speaking english, and since i'm the only non italian one, they just talk to each other in italian, and then english to me (about 40% of what they say to me is english anyway, the rest is in italian, which i do not understand, at all, talk about language barrier)
but anyway, my point, i do have one. all the while they were talking, i kept thinking to myself, "boy, if only i could speak some italian... mozzarella! ravioli! lasagna!"
*snicker* heh, i think it's funny.
ps, sorry about the sudden bombardment of comments, since we're not friends listed, i get these random hefner cravings or something, and then i binge, happens every time
no subject
Date: 2006-02-12 03:49 pm (UTC)TEACHER: Butt-Head, can you speak some Spanish for me?
BUTT-HEAD: Uhh... huh huh... uhh... tacos... burritos... nachos...
BEAVIS: Heh heh... SPAGHETTI!
So yeah, Mike Judge would think your joke is funny too. As do I, actually.
"Random Hefner cravings," interesting way to put it.