giggity giggity goo
Jun. 4th, 2007 03:52 pmThe thing is, I just know exactly what's gonna happen. I do.
I'll have some unbelievably sexy lass in my room-- the lights off, candles lit, Al Green on the stereo, fresh cocktails made for each of us-- and this girl will be classy, too, classier than any centerfold, but fiery, and she'll be curled on my bed, ready, willing, and wearing nothing but a smile... that's when I'll look her right in the eyes with a sly, lustful wink, and whisper, "Hey baby... after this, you wanna watch RAVENOUS?
"... What? What's wrong? I said 'after'!"
Because you see, even though I don't exactly want to be like Hugh or Dad, I still may truly earn the family name some day. Misty has said that I'm the most romantic person she's ever known. Tammy has said that what I did at Birthday Ball was still the most sweeping gesture she's ever been given. So yes, I may well have the Hefner in me after all.
But at the end of the day, I think the Heffie will far outweigh the Hefner.
So whaddya say, hot stuff? Howzabout we get into THE NINTH CONFIGURATION, if you know what I mean.
hEH.
Date: 2007-06-04 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 08:08 pm (UTC)Now I can Metaquote you for saying this!
It will happen, my dear. The Hefner Factor - like the X factor - lays dormant until some critical event catalyzes its activation. I'm sure that yours will manifest its unholy powers soon.
Re: hEH.
Date: 2007-06-04 08:08 pm (UTC)HAHAHAHAH! With context, that sounds so dirty.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 08:14 pm (UTC)Re: hEH.
Date: 2007-06-04 08:15 pm (UTC)Re: hEH.
Date: 2007-06-04 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 08:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 08:57 pm (UTC)Otherwise, I'd rather hang with you guys in a place where I can easier hold a conversation.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 09:05 pm (UTC)God, and ain't that just the bitter truth of it? Sexually, it's almost like "I wouldn't want to join a club that'd have someone like me for a member." Not exactly, but close to.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 09:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 10:41 pm (UTC)/ducks
wait a minute...
Date: 2007-06-04 11:14 pm (UTC)Fuzzy, if it doesn't work on your classy gal, then what the hell's the point?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 03:03 am (UTC)Also, it's not dormant, it's just aimed at a niche audience that's rather difficult to meet socially. But it's totally there.
Re: wait a minute...
Date: 2007-06-05 03:41 am (UTC)Also Bloo? Girls who go out with me for my Heffiness are decidedly few and far between. Remember, you and I may never have gone out at ALL had we not met the way we did, from the personals. If we knew each other in person first, or through mutual friends or at college or whatever, do you think we would have thought to have gone out? I'm genuinely wondering. Because remember, we were both refreshing for one another.
Also, if what doesn't work on the classy gal? The Hefner suave or the Heffie geek?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 03:44 am (UTC)And yeah, that actually sounds like a pretty accurate way to sum it up. Me like!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 04:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 04:26 am (UTC)My 'and then after...' line would probably be for Hunt for Red October. This may explain the lack of gents in my life lately. 'Sure I'll sleep with *you* but after could I have a little Sam Neill? I promise I'll be thinking of you the whole time!'
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 04:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 04:47 am (UTC)Tom Clancy, oh noes! Some day, remind me to tell you the story about how my girlfriend left me for the son of Tom Clancy. She chose a Clancy over a Hefner! Guns over bunnies!
At least this gives me an excuse for this icon. As if there's EVER a bad time for it.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 04:50 am (UTC)/sorry, Bloo, when it works, it works. (assuming she'll even read this far down)
You can confide all manner of wacky things in me, and all you'll have to worry about is me putting you in a book! Don't worry, I'll change your name to Bamara Bleibner.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 05:11 am (UTC)(Did I ever tell you about how I saw that movie in Tanzania? Not much of a story, but it will always stand out a bit more in my mind because of it.)
A Clancy over a Hefner? So what, she'd rather look at diagrams of tools than the actual equipment?
HEY!
Date: 2007-06-05 02:08 pm (UTC)Have you been talking to
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 02:36 pm (UTC)That's good, and I do, and I do not worry about it. But you are so not allowed to change my name if you should feel the need to novelize me. Unless it's to "Batman".
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-07 04:27 am (UTC)This totally raises the bar. My next trick will have to be quite something. I'll check out the music later tonight, but for now I'm still giggling at Bub.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-07 05:18 am (UTC)I'm working to ink a copy I made of it to post in LJ eventually. My inking skills leave a lot to be desired. As you can tell, I'm a frustrated cartoonist, but I'm pretty happy with how that turned out. I'm so, So glad you dug it.
Destroying the superspy mystique?? Johnny Go is all tuxes, martinis, and cool, baby! Also, Bub's in the military! It works!
I'm also happy with the Bub expressions on the bottom, and I think you liked them too. That said, I have to wonder what the heck Bub can, y'know, *do* in the stories. Johnny's the far more active one, while Bub just kinda watches in dog-like puzzlement and occasionally bursts into zombie rage and shoots somebody.
Actually, my friend
Also, if you want the playlist for the three CDs, I'll have to dig up the LJ entry I did a couple weeks back.
Re: HEY!
Date: 2007-06-07 02:10 pm (UTC)i am far better behaved than i once was.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-07 03:37 pm (UTC)Yeah, I didn't know about this cartooning thing, but it's obvious from looking at them. You really do get everywhere.
The problem is that they keep tiptoeing around, humming the theme from "Mission: Impossible". Nick Fury doesn't appreciate that. Plus, Bub does a very unflattering impression of him.
I think Bub's what makes the stories work. Bub is Johnny's audience, and since Johnny's style of talking is audience-banter, which is very clear on providing both sides of the conversation yourself, he works perfectly. Plus, Bub occasionally throws him off, which is even better. The fact that his face is so expressive means he doesn't even need to talk. He's the perfect sidekick: a cross between the straight man and a thinking-brain dog (if you haven't read any Discworld, that will be a less colourful simile).
Ha. That's spot-on.
Already did!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-07 03:53 pm (UTC)Yeah, I didn't know about this cartooning thing, but it's obvious from looking at them. You really do get everywhere.
I just never had the patience to learn perspective, consistent form, or, well, anything other than facial expressions and sometimes body language. It's the ham actor in me, I guess. Art proved too frustrating to be worth the trouble.
But now what you're saying only confirms my fears that Bub and Johnny just HAVE to be a comic, or some other visual medium. Prose just ain't gonna sell Bub himself. In pure text, he'll be invisible, especially next to Johnny. Shit shit shit.
As for your assessment of Bub and Johnny's dynamic: great! OK, then it works. I don't have to worry so much about that, then.
Now that visual of Bub and Johnny harassing Nick Fury amuses me endlessly. They really are such characters that apply to most any visual. "Bub and Johnny in BRIDGES OF MADISON COUNTY! Go!" or Bub and Johnny in WAITING FOR GODOT:
"Hey guys, it's me! Godot! How's it hangin'?"
"...!"
"Nah, I'm just screwin' with ya. Hm, nice digs. There a mini-bar around here?"
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 03:07 am (UTC)why, hello stranger
Date: 2007-06-12 03:20 am (UTC)