One sound effect review: "Zzzzzzz"
Aug. 10th, 2010 10:42 pmWe just saw INCEPTION. Or, as I like to call it, FORGONE CONCLUSION: THE MOTION PICTURE.
Seriously, if you're gonna make a film with twists so evident early on, at least try to populate it with interesting characters who actually sound like people and less like plot devices, so that we can enjoy watching the story go through the motions instead of going through a boring film that actually feels longer than its own two-and-a-half-hour-long run time. Unless that's some meta comment on the passage of time in the dream state.
Expect spoilers in the comments, as I anticipate contention from what appears to be the most beloved and critically-celebrated live-action non-sparky-vampire film of the year.
Honestly, INCEPTION would be a kick-ass video game. It would have been a far more involving and exciting use of the realms and rules.
Seriously, if you're gonna make a film with twists so evident early on, at least try to populate it with interesting characters who actually sound like people and less like plot devices, so that we can enjoy watching the story go through the motions instead of going through a boring film that actually feels longer than its own two-and-a-half-hour-long run time. Unless that's some meta comment on the passage of time in the dream state.
Expect spoilers in the comments, as I anticipate contention from what appears to be the most beloved and critically-celebrated live-action non-sparky-vampire film of the year.
Honestly, INCEPTION would be a kick-ass video game. It would have been a far more involving and exciting use of the realms and rules.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 02:58 am (UTC)I feel like this is a film that makes people feel like they can congratulate themselves for "getting it," whereas we just felt insulted that we were supposed to be surprised by where the film was going. Know what I mean?
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 03:23 am (UTC)To contradict
But that's all gravy, because what this film really is, as its trailer tag lines stated all along, is a heist caper. As much as it flashes with spectacle and teases with deeper implications - the metafictionality of Cobb's phantom-wife pointing out how much his "real life" resembles an overly dramatic paranoid delusion flew over a lot of folks' heads, even though it telegraphed the ambiguous ending with sledgehammer subtlety - ultimately, that was all window-dressing for the scam, and because we were already there alongside the con artists, we were already in on it, just as with any number of similar stories set outside of someone's subconscious.
I don't think the film was even trying to surprise people all that much with its conclusion, so much as it was requiring them to do some fun mental math to follow along toward a conclusion that many had already guessed at.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 04:06 am (UTC)If I don't care about the characters, I don't care period, and none of the mechanics can make me give a damn about how they get to where I can already tell they're going from the start.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 04:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 04:29 am (UTC)Also, just saw this and thought it would be relevant to our discussion:
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 04:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 11:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-12 05:45 am (UTC)I've just been there so far that I can what's real and what's comedy.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-12 05:47 am (UTC)Every time I read an article from The Onion, my default assumption is that it will come true within a few years.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-12 06:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 06:56 pm (UTC)Um, anyway. Regarding con artists, I suspect that you and I are each speaking to something primal in our respective childhoods.
Here's my cards on the table:
As a little kid who didn't fit neatly into any one educational category, I learned very quickly that most adults outside of my family were not to be trusted. I was diagnosed as learning disabled when I was very young, and when a later diagnosis said that I was actually an accelerated learner, during my early years of grade school, I could tell that the grown-ups who dealt with me would have preferred it if I was simply incapable of learning.
As such, I got a lot of adults telling me to do things, and then saying later, "I never told you to do that," to make me look and feel dumb for not following directions properly. This was how I learned to mimic others, because I wondered if there was something wrong with my memory, so the next time I had some grown-up lying to me about what he'd instructed me to do, I did such a dead-on impression of him, right down to the tilt of his head and the nasal pitch of his voice, that even his colleagues laughed out loud and said, "You MUST have said that!" Hearing him admit, with undeniable anger in his voice, that he must have been mistaken was the first time I ever heard an adult admit that they were wrong and I was right, and that spiteful sense of satisfaction has motivated me ever since.
I don't believe in using deceit to manipulate those who are already at a disadvantage, but when you're going up against the big and powerful (and it's interesting that Nolan took such care to portray the Inception team's scam as accomplishing a greater societal good, by breaking up a potential monopoly of power), I consider such manipulation to be not only morally permissible, but almost obligatory, because those who lord it over others deserve to be humbled and brought low by scam artists.
Everybody admits that the world is unfair, but what few people want to acknowledge is that the world is unfair because it was CREATED to be unfair - the deck is stacked against you not just by RANDOM CHANCE, but because GOD HIMSELF (or whatever passes for such) has specifically set out to screw you, and as such, as long as you're EQUALIZING that on behalf of those who were born with bullseyes on their backs, then that's fair game.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 11:15 pm (UTC)Okay, granted, the sexual fetishizing of child molestation also kind of takes me out of the moment more than a bit, but still ... Lionel Richie?
In fact, you know what? I'm gonna post a Craigslist ad inviting all comers to a BDSM orgy modeled after The Matrix, and then, when they get there, THIS will be its fucking soundtrack:
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 02:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 01:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 03:31 am (UTC)Honestly, I come at it from the perspective of someone who's been pretty obsessed with lucid dreaming for awhile. I just really appreciated the depth with which they approached how dreams work and really enjoyed watching a movie all about that. Like the scene in the hotel where gravity suddenly goes away? That's one of the biggest struggles I dealt with when getting into lucid dreaming - as soon as I became aware of being in a dream, I couldn't stop my dream body from just floating up to the ceiling. The totems they used as their reality checks? I totally have reality checks that I use when in dreams to become aware of the dream state. Not an object that I carry all the time, but things like trying to read small print or a digital clock, or flicking a light switch etc. And not being able to remember how you got there is definitely one of the biggest clues.
So I just appreciated all of that stuff. I also appreciated that they made the ending debatable. A twist that can only be read one way is just a twist, but this ending was interesting because yeah, the top was spinning when the movie cut out, but it could have been about to drop at any moment. I like that he walked away before finding out. To Cobb it didn't really matter anymore what was real - he was where he wanted to be. To me that's the most interesting part about the ending - much more so than ZOMG IS HE STILL DREAMING???
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 04:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 04:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 04:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 06:08 am (UTC)Other than that and some visuals, zzzzzzzzzzz here too.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-11 06:16 am (UTC)The rest of the time, I just wanted Freddy Kruger to show up and wreak havoc with everyone's shit, not to mention inject some actual dark fun into that "Why so serious?" film. And then we could have had an epic Freddy/Mol showdown. I'd buy that for a dollar.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-03 10:34 am (UTC)I'd read that.
Inception... I've seen it twice, and it's just... unsatisfying. Which is also what I felt from Nolan's Batman movies. So much cool stuff and possibility in there, but the whole feels like less than the sum of its parts.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-12 01:04 am (UTC)Now to read your comments and see if all the conclusions I drew from the previews and Entertainment Weekly are correct!
Also, I may have to give you something.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-12 04:45 am (UTC)Henry Jenkins has actually written about how "Inception" is the kind of movie that could appeal more to gamers, because of the "dream levels" and precisely because the characters are primarily plot devices. You are spot on: it would make a kick-ass video game. Unfortunately, it seems to take itself seriously, so I doubt we'll ever see a game adaptation...