Charge of the Indecency Squad
Jun. 9th, 2006 12:04 amFrom aintitcool.com:
"Today, the FCC notified broadcasters that fines for “indecent” material would be increased up to ten times.
Previously, the maximum fine for “indecency” was $32,500 per occurrence. That fine can now be as high as $325,000. This fine does not apply to cable or satellite broadcasters. Alarmingly, the measure does not specify what “indecency” actually is.
From AP:
"This is a victory for children and families," said Senate sponsor Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan. The higher fines were needed, he said, "in a world saturated with violent and explicit media."
A while back, I conducted an interview with HowardTV’s Doug Goodstein, in which we discussed the probability that regulation of this nature might compel creators and producers to move towards less policed outlets to tell their stories – perhaps even to iN Demand services (where Stern’s television component can now be seen). I wonder if today’s news will push such folk further away from networks – towards cable and beyond?"
*headdesk*
*headdesk*
*headdesk*
Y'know, it's a real eye-opener to watch reruns of IN LIVING COLOR, a show which ran on regular ol' non-cable Fox, and to hear it frequently bleeped out. Think about that. What was perfectly fine to say on TV little over ten years ago is "bad" now. On cable TV. While in Europe, content on basic TV is aired mostly unedited and uncensored.
"Today, the FCC notified broadcasters that fines for “indecent” material would be increased up to ten times.
Previously, the maximum fine for “indecency” was $32,500 per occurrence. That fine can now be as high as $325,000. This fine does not apply to cable or satellite broadcasters. Alarmingly, the measure does not specify what “indecency” actually is.
From AP:
"This is a victory for children and families," said Senate sponsor Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan. The higher fines were needed, he said, "in a world saturated with violent and explicit media."
A while back, I conducted an interview with HowardTV’s Doug Goodstein, in which we discussed the probability that regulation of this nature might compel creators and producers to move towards less policed outlets to tell their stories – perhaps even to iN Demand services (where Stern’s television component can now be seen). I wonder if today’s news will push such folk further away from networks – towards cable and beyond?"
*headdesk*
*headdesk*
*headdesk*
Y'know, it's a real eye-opener to watch reruns of IN LIVING COLOR, a show which ran on regular ol' non-cable Fox, and to hear it frequently bleeped out. Think about that. What was perfectly fine to say on TV little over ten years ago is "bad" now. On cable TV. While in Europe, content on basic TV is aired mostly unedited and uncensored.