thehefner: (OMGWTFZOMBIERICHARDS)
[personal profile] thehefner
Oh God. Yes, I know Alan Moore has read the script and totally disavowed this movie. Yes, I know the screenplay is adapted by the Matrix hacks. Yes, that horrible "V,V,V" monologue is there. Yes, I know so far every adaptation of Alan Moore's absolutely fucking brilliant comics has been utter hackery (FROM HELL sucked my nuts and was formulaic as all hell, especially compared to the original, LEAGUE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENTLEMEN doesn't even deserved to be dignified by my heaping scorn upon it... now I heard CONSTANTINE was actually pretty good, but seriously, Keanu as Constantine? Nothing can make me accept that). And they started filming earlier this year and they're rushing film production so they can get it released by November 5th, to coincide with the anniversary of Guy Fawkes Day. This movie has everything stacked against it.

But-but-but it has the mask and lines of dialog right from the comic and oooh and that very image of V standing naked in front of a fire, right out of the book, and it has Natalie Portman and Hugo Weaving being all whispery and Stephen Rea where the hell has he been since The Crying Game and yay John Hurt I love John Hurt and Stephen Fry, everything's good with that pudgy gay man and it's V it's the costume and it's perfect and... and... and...

Oh God, I just want to pretend, just for this little bit that it's not going to suck. Because that trailer looks kinda really cool. Sighhhh... remember, remember, the 5th of November...

Speaking of comic book movies

Date: 2005-07-24 03:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tompurdue.livejournal.com
From Roger Ebert's latest Answer Man column (re Fantastic Four)

What I learned while reading dozens of messages is that comics fans have made enormous psychic investments in their favorite characters, and follow their origins, adventures, opponents and character changes with an attention bordering on obsession. I saw a bad movie. Many of them saw a movie whose goodness or badness was secondary, since whatever happened on the screen was linked in their imaginations with an extensive pre-history.

Re: Speaking of comic book movies

Date: 2005-07-24 06:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thehefner.livejournal.com
I have to wonder, is it just comic fans that feel this way? Wouldn't any fan mentality extend to this? Whenever people single out comic readers for something I get itchy.

Regardless, he's right, of course. In fact, for my part that's one of the reasons why I'm the one guy who liked the Daredevil movie. However, the Hulk movie was a huuuuuge depature from the character and his origins, yet I still loved it as a movie. However still, Tim Burton's Batman movies have aged poorly, and since Batman Begins showed the world what the real Batman of the comics is like, Burton's films just don't hold up that well.

Re: Speaking of comic book movies

Date: 2005-07-24 07:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tompurdue.livejournal.com
It applies to every fandom, comics or otherwise. But the physicists have given up on getting movies to portray their fandom accurately.

September 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 5th, 2026 03:24 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios