ALL RIGHT, so Roy Cox (the photographer who did my kick-ass HEFNER MONOLOGUES photos last year) just got an opening for me in exactly one week for a two-outfit session of sexy photos. This is great news, because I was originally scheduled for April 29th, which would really have put a serious strain on the May 16th deadline for DC Fringe's promotional material. So that's one less thing to worry about.
I have just been so on edge, stressed, and depressed these past few weeks, struggling to get the new show under 75 minutes (without rushing AND with audience laughter), cutting the script down past the bone. The editing has been good, in some ways. It forces me to make the show tighter, to discard the less important bits that drag the show down (while at the risk of losing technically-unessential parts that people still love, like the whole "Day in Traffic Court" story). The "Drunk in Bath" story is decidedly different in several ways, but I think it's now much tighter and far more effective than it's ever been.
But all this editing, memorization and rehearsal of revised and new material has kept me from writing the new show, the one for which I'm doing at DC Fringe and seeing Roy Cox. Now, the idea is to go back into hermitage this Thursday to Saturday and write the fucking thing, to face my fears and nail this bad boy.
Because even besides the obvious I-need-the-fucking-script factor, I don't even know what kind of themes I'm gonna want when I see Roy, because I'm not entirely certain what themes will pop out in the script. DC Fringe head Julianne Brienza suggested that I do the opposite approach from last year: while THE HEFNER MONOLOGUES had a goofy crazy marketing style, this should be more serious, reflecting the tragicomic of the new show, whatever it's called.
Yes, I'm still struggling with the new title. I still kind of like SON OF THE HEFNER MONOLOGUES, even though it doesn't really make sense.
fiveseconddelay is a big fan of SON OF A HEFNER (MONOLOGUE), but I dunno.
It's been suggested that maybe I don't necessarily want to use THE HEFNER MONOLOGUES in every show I do. After all, it works for the first show, but after that, it's kind of like how THE THIN MAN and THE PINK PANTHER reused the title purely for brand recognition, while having nothing to do with the stories. Not to mention that I might be seen as riding Eve Ensler too hard.
It occurred to me that the answer might come from
cavenessity's bright idea: www.thehefner.com. Maybe the brand recognition shouldn't be THE HEFNER MONOLOGUES but simply THE HEFNER.
THE HEFNER'S PROGRESS.
THE HEFNER IDENTITY/SUPREMACY/ULTIMATUM.
THE UNBEARABLE LIGHTNESS OF HEFNER. (props to
angrylemur)
CHILDREN OF THE LESSER HEFNER (once I have kids, and all the stories that will come with 'em)
THE HEFNER, PARTY OF ONE (NO WAITING) (
fiveseconddelay)
THE COMPLETE IDIOT'S GUIDE TO THE HEFNER.
YOU! ON THE HEFNER. (both
spacechild's contributions)
Seriously, though, I won't really know until I write the fucking thing. Thursday to Saturday. Peace and quiet. No lallygagging.
We're gonna try to get some folks together Saturday the 19th for a test audience of the 75-minute HEFNER MONOLOGUES cut. If you want in, lemme know, we'd love to have you.
I have just been so on edge, stressed, and depressed these past few weeks, struggling to get the new show under 75 minutes (without rushing AND with audience laughter), cutting the script down past the bone. The editing has been good, in some ways. It forces me to make the show tighter, to discard the less important bits that drag the show down (while at the risk of losing technically-unessential parts that people still love, like the whole "Day in Traffic Court" story). The "Drunk in Bath" story is decidedly different in several ways, but I think it's now much tighter and far more effective than it's ever been.
But all this editing, memorization and rehearsal of revised and new material has kept me from writing the new show, the one for which I'm doing at DC Fringe and seeing Roy Cox. Now, the idea is to go back into hermitage this Thursday to Saturday and write the fucking thing, to face my fears and nail this bad boy.
Because even besides the obvious I-need-the-fucking-script factor, I don't even know what kind of themes I'm gonna want when I see Roy, because I'm not entirely certain what themes will pop out in the script. DC Fringe head Julianne Brienza suggested that I do the opposite approach from last year: while THE HEFNER MONOLOGUES had a goofy crazy marketing style, this should be more serious, reflecting the tragicomic of the new show, whatever it's called.
Yes, I'm still struggling with the new title. I still kind of like SON OF THE HEFNER MONOLOGUES, even though it doesn't really make sense.
It's been suggested that maybe I don't necessarily want to use THE HEFNER MONOLOGUES in every show I do. After all, it works for the first show, but after that, it's kind of like how THE THIN MAN and THE PINK PANTHER reused the title purely for brand recognition, while having nothing to do with the stories. Not to mention that I might be seen as riding Eve Ensler too hard.
It occurred to me that the answer might come from
THE HEFNER'S PROGRESS.
THE HEFNER IDENTITY/SUPREMACY/ULTIMATUM.
THE UNBEARABLE LIGHTNESS OF HEFNER. (props to
CHILDREN OF THE LESSER HEFNER (once I have kids, and all the stories that will come with 'em)
THE HEFNER, PARTY OF ONE (NO WAITING) (
THE COMPLETE IDIOT'S GUIDE TO THE HEFNER.
YOU! ON THE HEFNER. (both
Seriously, though, I won't really know until I write the fucking thing. Thursday to Saturday. Peace and quiet. No lallygagging.
We're gonna try to get some folks together Saturday the 19th for a test audience of the 75-minute HEFNER MONOLOGUES cut. If you want in, lemme know, we'd love to have you.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 10:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 10:09 pm (UTC)Although I'm not always certain what "fascinating" means with you...
;p
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:46 pm (UTC)???
On the idea front, I am bereft of hef ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 10:02 pm (UTC)That... just might be perfect.
I told Mom that one, just to joke about all the fun fake titles, but the second I said it out loud, we both went "... oh." She's still going, "It's beautiful, it's perfect."
We now have a new front-runner. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 07:14 am (UTC)Don't fear the Hefner
and for your revised show THE HEFNER MONOLOGUES: Now with more cowbell
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 10:40 pm (UTC)Just thought you'd want to know.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 10:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 03:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 03:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 03:44 am (UTC)I'm looking forward to seeing the new show at Fringe this year :)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 03:55 am (UTC)Thanks! I'm looking forward to... um... having a script!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 04:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 05:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 05:18 am (UTC)That said, this might involve me in a wifebeater, which might be more of me than anybody really wants to see. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 05:21 am (UTC)Also, Glamorshots.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 05:28 am (UTC)Hey, at least we didn't go with my director's original idea: me dressed in full Playmate bunny regalia. I vetoed that one on the spot. Thank me.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 05:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 05:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 05:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 05:43 am (UTC)Hm. You know, if YOU wore the smoking jacket and *I* wore the bunny outfit, it'd certainly be funnier, although at the expense of teh sexy.
Ah, thus is the ultimate conundrum of my life. Funny vs. sexy.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 05:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 05:50 am (UTC)You know that kinda does make you hotter in my eyes, right? Any ol' girl can do "sexy" photos, but that? That's just awesome.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 05:56 am (UTC)It was either this or the Great Pumpkin scene from the Charlie Brown Halloween special. I have no idea why the ladies didn't want to do that.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 06:02 am (UTC)That said, I have to wonder what you have done with the Great Pumpkin. The only thing that comes to mind ROBOT CHICKEN version.