Ta-daaaaaa! It's... gone!
Aug. 1st, 2008 11:44 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Man, two weeks later, and people are *still* commenting on my criticisms of THE DARK KNIGHT and Harvey in general. If you go there, you'll find several people with critiques and analysis almost as long-winded as my own, not arguments or even heated debate but rather thoughtful, reasoned discussion pretty much all-around. And I swear, I can't think of any point where any other film has provoked so much thoughtful discussion (whether positive or negative) from so many people, especially here from my friends(-list).
But I don't take this as commentary on the "brilliance" of THE DARK KNIGHT, joining in on the chorus of critics and fans who are hailing it as "Oh thank god, we finally have ART in a mainstream movie!" Rather, I keep feeling it's more indicative of mainstream pop entertainment in general, that we don't have enough popular films on average to even reaching these heights of discussability. And/or the films that we do have, not enough people see, so we can't/don't/won't discuss "art" like this on a regular basis.
Shit, when I saw THERE WILL BE BLOOD, no one I knew wanted to have a long, analytical examination about the film and its themes, about whether Daniel Plainview was truly evil or tragically sympathetic, whether the film was truly about oil or family. For that, I had to go to my mother and then join an LJ community comprised of squealing fangirls who write in all caps and swoon over the chestless moppy wonder of Paul Dano. Clearly, there's something wrong with society.
And really, THE DARK KNIGHT is hardly a perfect film, yet people have been jizzing ever since they saw it, and I fear for many, no amount of reviewing and reconsideration upon repeat viewings will make them stop humping the film's leg to see it as it is.
And maybe it's because of those people that I wince whenever people start hailing it as "art," implicitly or explicitly proclaiming that it's the first time superhero films have achieved a status higher than escapist popcorn fare. I don't even know where to begin with that.
Like, is THE DARK KNIGHT really that un-Hollywood-y as we seem to think? Is it really different from or superior to, say, IRON MAN, which actually seriously honestly was arguably as epic and deep as THE DARK KNIGHT, but people didn't notice that because it wasn't all dark and angsty? Are these people being condescending to other such films, or is this pointing towards a certain kind of geek who wants to see their fandoms depicted in only the most serious, somber fashion, because they're still insecure about loving "immature" fare?
I don't know where to start, and frankly, my brain is not with me, so have some links.
First of all, leave it to the lovely
lovedatjoker to rather perfectly sum up (and exceed) my thoughts on Heath Ledger's Joker and whether or not he truly is the "definitive" take on the character. Like her, I fear that we'll be seeing far too many airheaded fools embracing Heath and only Heath's take as the one true holy perfect take, imbuing it in everywhere from comics to fanfic to cosplay. And as awesome and rich as Heath's performance was, it says something about Joker when I say it would severely limit the character to reduce him to that one take.
Finally, as I mentioned in my critiques, I found certain elements of THE DARK KNIGHT's ending to be somewhat... ambiguous. People are still arguing whether or not... certain things happened.
Well, for those who do know what I'm talking about and don't mind SPOILERS... allow me to point you towards this and then this, specifically producer Emma Thomas' comments.
Told ya. Now all they have to do is run with it, if they want. Fingers seriously fucking crossed they do. If they do, and if they handle it correctly, it could well assuage a few of those complaints I had and make THE DARK KNIGHT even better as a result.
Maybe then I might finally join in on the "art"gasms.
But I don't take this as commentary on the "brilliance" of THE DARK KNIGHT, joining in on the chorus of critics and fans who are hailing it as "Oh thank god, we finally have ART in a mainstream movie!" Rather, I keep feeling it's more indicative of mainstream pop entertainment in general, that we don't have enough popular films on average to even reaching these heights of discussability. And/or the films that we do have, not enough people see, so we can't/don't/won't discuss "art" like this on a regular basis.
Shit, when I saw THERE WILL BE BLOOD, no one I knew wanted to have a long, analytical examination about the film and its themes, about whether Daniel Plainview was truly evil or tragically sympathetic, whether the film was truly about oil or family. For that, I had to go to my mother and then join an LJ community comprised of squealing fangirls who write in all caps and swoon over the chestless moppy wonder of Paul Dano. Clearly, there's something wrong with society.
And really, THE DARK KNIGHT is hardly a perfect film, yet people have been jizzing ever since they saw it, and I fear for many, no amount of reviewing and reconsideration upon repeat viewings will make them stop humping the film's leg to see it as it is.
And maybe it's because of those people that I wince whenever people start hailing it as "art," implicitly or explicitly proclaiming that it's the first time superhero films have achieved a status higher than escapist popcorn fare. I don't even know where to begin with that.
Like, is THE DARK KNIGHT really that un-Hollywood-y as we seem to think? Is it really different from or superior to, say, IRON MAN, which actually seriously honestly was arguably as epic and deep as THE DARK KNIGHT, but people didn't notice that because it wasn't all dark and angsty? Are these people being condescending to other such films, or is this pointing towards a certain kind of geek who wants to see their fandoms depicted in only the most serious, somber fashion, because they're still insecure about loving "immature" fare?
I don't know where to start, and frankly, my brain is not with me, so have some links.
First of all, leave it to the lovely
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Finally, as I mentioned in my critiques, I found certain elements of THE DARK KNIGHT's ending to be somewhat... ambiguous. People are still arguing whether or not... certain things happened.
Well, for those who do know what I'm talking about and don't mind SPOILERS... allow me to point you towards this and then this, specifically producer Emma Thomas' comments.
Told ya. Now all they have to do is run with it, if they want. Fingers seriously fucking crossed they do. If they do, and if they handle it correctly, it could well assuage a few of those complaints I had and make THE DARK KNIGHT even better as a result.
Maybe then I might finally join in on the "art"gasms.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 05:51 pm (UTC)Anyway.
I think the fact that Batman is such a beloved character for so wide an audience makes this movie something so many people want to talk about and dissect. Everybody knows who Batman is, we've already had a history with Batman (in one form or another), and so while our standards are high, we WANT to love this movie. And we're loyal to the character of Batman, because he is so familiar and so dear.
The interesting thing about this latest reboot is it hasn't yet become established as the franchise that people will see even when they doubt the movie's quality. (George Lucas, I'm looking in your direction.) To those franchises, it's an obligation on the fan's part to watch the latest movie, in an attempt to relive the great beginnings. I think a/the third Nolan movie is going to be worth watching, sure, but I don't feel like a captured fan that has some kind of obligation to see it. I sort of felt that way with Batman Forever and Batman and Robin - I knew going into the theater that they weren't going to be "good" movies, but my loyalty to Batman got me in the seat anyway. I definitely felt obligated with the newest Star Wars trilogy, and had pangs about not seeing the latest Indiana Jones movie for the same reason - it felt traitorous not to watch.
Remember our conversation about how contemporary American fiction seems to be working under the assumption that happiness and pleasantry is the opiate of the masses, and that "real" art lies in cynicism and tragedy? I think this is the same reason why so many argue that TDK is a superior film to Iron Man. An uplifting story is passe, man. Hope is out of fashion.
(haha, maybe Obama will usher in a new, more cheerful wave of fiction with his campaign?)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 07:51 pm (UTC)Hope-based stories... god, what will happen when those become as abused and overdone as the cynical crushed-idealist stories that currently flood our bookshelves and stages?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 07:15 pm (UTC)"Ra's may have had a Lazarus pit in the comics, but we don't see Nolan resorting to such comic book gimmickry to bring him back."
Yeah, because God forbid a movie about Batman fighting costumed villains ever resorted to lowly comic book ideas. (headdesk)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 10:41 pm (UTC)But OMG what they're doing to Harley... and Mistah J... and all the OCs!! argggggggg.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 10:56 pm (UTC)(psssst - this is the part where you tell me how awesome my icon is too btw)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 11:43 pm (UTC)Hey, awesome icon! Sexy too!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 11:50 pm (UTC)oh yeah GS is on the list. It just came out this past week didn't it? I think it's a great story. I'm not sure I feel he's obsessed with Batman to that degree, but it's lovely for so many reasons.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 11:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 11:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 12:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 12:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 03:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 12:12 am (UTC)I didn't expect to be rooting for the evil oil tycoon, but damn if I didn't enjoy watching him beat that churchy prick to death. Though I wish he'd been able to drag him out of the closet first. Oh well. SEQUEL? :D
no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 10:41 pm (UTC)Yeah I'm excited for it!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-03 10:42 pm (UTC)http://aintitcool.com/node/37551