BAT-BALE: Grrgrll farggle raar!
Sep. 11th, 2008 09:28 pmI really, really liked THE DARK KNIGHT. Parts of it, I outright loved. But the next person who says that it's a brilliant film, flawless and a masterpiece, I'm gonna send them this:
In the tradition of Movies in Fifteen Minutes: THE DARK KNIGHT: The 'Abridged Script'.
I tried to quote my favorite highlights, but soon realized I'd end up copy-pasting half the "script" here. But I've gotta mention this:
AARON ECKHART: You asshole, why did you kill my girlfriend?
HEATH LEDGER: I’m an agent of chaos. I just do things.
AARON ECKHART: Wow, that’s some sophisticated characterization there. As soon as I get out of these surprisingly strong bandages, I’m going to kill you!
HEATH LEDGER: Look, you don’t want to kill me for murdering her. You want to kill everyone else for failing to stop me from murdering her!
AARON ECKHART: That doesn’t make any sense at all.
HEATH LEDGER: And yet, it’s going to be your main character motivation for the rest of the movie. Now make with the murder, Sir Skins-A-Lot.
Magnificent.
I'm anxious to finally see TDK in IMAX this weekend, ready to embrace all the things I do love about the film (being the majority) but the more this film continues to be hyped, the less willing I am to forgive its flaws.
Still, it's a testament to a film that I was so incredibly hyped to see over the past two years that, even with all the problems I had with the final movie, I still wasn't disappointed with the overall experience.
In the tradition of Movies in Fifteen Minutes: THE DARK KNIGHT: The 'Abridged Script'.
I tried to quote my favorite highlights, but soon realized I'd end up copy-pasting half the "script" here. But I've gotta mention this:
AARON ECKHART: You asshole, why did you kill my girlfriend?
HEATH LEDGER: I’m an agent of chaos. I just do things.
AARON ECKHART: Wow, that’s some sophisticated characterization there. As soon as I get out of these surprisingly strong bandages, I’m going to kill you!
HEATH LEDGER: Look, you don’t want to kill me for murdering her. You want to kill everyone else for failing to stop me from murdering her!
AARON ECKHART: That doesn’t make any sense at all.
HEATH LEDGER: And yet, it’s going to be your main character motivation for the rest of the movie. Now make with the murder, Sir Skins-A-Lot.
Magnificent.
I'm anxious to finally see TDK in IMAX this weekend, ready to embrace all the things I do love about the film (being the majority) but the more this film continues to be hyped, the less willing I am to forgive its flaws.
Still, it's a testament to a film that I was so incredibly hyped to see over the past two years that, even with all the problems I had with the final movie, I still wasn't disappointed with the overall experience.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 01:47 am (UTC)Harvey wanted to kill him, Two-Face preferred the notion of chaos. Hence the coin toss.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 01:51 am (UTC)Also, you bring up Harvey's wants versus Two-Face's wants, but the movie doesn't even touch on actual duality. There was no sense of conflict between warring sides tearing Harvey apart, which would cause him to flip the coin as a tie-breaker.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 02:16 am (UTC)And as for the movie itself, I just... I can't get over him letting the Joker off without even doing something. Harvey is the GOOD side, so he should be doing the GOOD thing by doing what Harvey Dent would do and bring the Joker to justice. Two-Face would kill him, but Harvey would bring him down by the book.
Two-Face is not about kill or not kill. He's a clash between Harvey's nobility and Two-Face's burning, hateful fury. We got none of that here.
Know what I mean?
EDIT: Egad, let's remove some of these italics. Sorry, my passion sometimes gets the better of me.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 02:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 02:25 am (UTC)And I do agree, the hospital scene's a great scene, don't get me wrong. I mean, putting aside how I think it messes up Harvey's character, taken on its own it's a fantastic scene. But it still does Harvey a disservice, and as I said in my huge rant when the film came out, the rush-job on Harvey actually kinda unravels the film as a whole.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 06:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 01:58 am (UTC)I think his motivation was BEING CRAZY FROM HAVING HALF HIS FACE BURNED OFF. And not taking any painkillers, which they mentioned.
Me, if I burn my finger on the fucking stove I want to kill, let alone burning off half my face.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 06:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 03:10 am (UTC)Oh.
My.
God.
I love the RANDOM caps STREWN all throughOUT this BRILLIANT SUMMATION of the DARK Knight.
Also:
That's as almost as much win as Dr. Doom wearing the Infinity Gauntlet.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 03:17 am (UTC)But yeah, the script is brilliant, ain't it?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 03:23 am (UTC)...
Clearly, I need to give you a reading list, starting with the motherfucking THE THANOS QUEST, then THE INFINITY GAUNTLET - best line-wide crossover EVER PUBLISHED - and then the INFINITY WAR and INFINITY CRUSADE.
The current working theory on my journal, espoused by a sharp-eyed Michael Paciocco, is that this is a What If? story that features a time traveling Doom after the Beyonder episode.
...Wait, you don't know who the Beyonder is, do you?
Oh, hell. Let me add some stuff to your mandatory reading list.
Like Secret War 1, Secret War 2, and Operation Galactic Storm.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 03:34 am (UTC)To understand Beyonder!Doom, you have to read Secret Wars 1 and 2 again.
CELESTIALS are on that cover. 'Nuff said.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 03:43 am (UTC)Hard to believe it's the same Jim Starlin who did DEATH OF THE NEW GODS and that new Hawkman... thing.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 03:52 am (UTC)(That Hawkman...thing. When that was posted on S_D, I jokingly called Katar Hol a fascist on scans_daily - because that's been a running joke on the comm for, what, four years? - apparently causing at least one member of your flist to take OMG SERIOUS UMBRAGE.)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 03:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 06:27 pm (UTC)Yeah, that's always bugged me about superheroes in general. They set out the plot points ("X defeats Y") and the capabilities and strengths of X and Y are jiggered to match. It's not a terrible problem as long as (a) the scene is otherwise visually interesting, and (b) the plot point they want to get to is also interesting.
For some reason, this line kills me:
CHRISTIAN BALE crashes his bike like a PUTZ.
It's the capitalization of the final word that does it, in the context. It just kills me.
Oh, BTW: really enjoying The Venture Brothers. Not every joke lands, and the biggest wins aren't as big as the biggest wins of South Park, but I think it gets a higher percentage of jokes that do land.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 06:40 pm (UTC)For me, the appeal of good superhero stories are when they actually do cleverly pair off the attributes of characters X and Y. It happens, but not often enough.
You are? Oh excellent! Whereabouts are you in the series?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 07:04 pm (UTC)I do so love half-hour comedies. Go in, get 22 minutes of mindless entertainment, go do something else. Or indulge in another 22 mindless minutes without feeling like you're wasting your life.
Unless, of course, those 22 minutes are so egregiously stupid that you actually emerge dumber than when you started. Which describes nearly all half-hour comedies.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 07:09 pm (UTC)Yeah, that very much is the problem with most half-hour comedies. Like I say, I appreciate Venture Brothers for how it handles character development and humor that comes from familiarity with these people and their situations, until we all become part of the in-joke. Jackson recently said that Seasons 3 and (the upcoming) 4, he realized, were very unfriendly to new viewers in this respect.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 07:03 pm (UTC)The second time I watched the film this reduced me a little ball of incoherent forensic-science-filled rage. The first time I watched the film I had already been forcibly dragged from the cinema by that point. (Did I ever tell you about my abortive attempts to go see the Dark Knight?)
It's a fun parody, and highlights most of the niggles I had with the fun (the end of the Joker-in-the-penthouse scene was problematic, the whole Harvey turns to Two-Face also had major problems, as you have so eloquently noted)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-12 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 10:49 pm (UTC)You didn’t seem to have a problem letting Liam Neeson die in the last movie, and all he did was blow up your house.
Because it's totally my favorite bit.
Possibly because nobody else has mentioned the stupid in it.
*runs off and pimps link like a big damn dork because she's had two energy drinks today*