![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I have returned from Tuscaloosa with a Henchgirl and a stomach flu, to discover that the teaser trailer for the video game sequel to BATMAN: ARKHAM ASYLUM has made the rounds.
I couldn't actually play B:AA, so perhaps I missed out on a lot of the game's much-lauded appeal. I was expecting a lot more from it, between the Holy Trinity of Conroy, Hamill, and Sorkin united under the usually-superior pen of Paul Dini, and the rave reviews all-around. Instead, I found the dialogue to be far beyond Dini's usual standard, with the Joker being not that funny and Harley sounded rather more like Grant Morrison's tone-deaf Squeaky Fromme take from that abysmal BATMAN (purple) prose issue. I was holding out hope, that maybe it was all going somewhere really awesome. And then, yeah, not really.
Maybe it was more fun to play than to watch. Either way, I felt like the only person to be rather disappointed by the game.
That said, the trailer fills me with giddy geek glee. Hamill's laugh STILL makes my heart go aflutter, especially the way it's done there. The hints at the other villains to be included also pleases me gr... oh fuck it, if you watched that, you know exactly why *I'm* excited:

On one hand, I'm nervous about how this game might cock-up the character. On the other...*fingers crossed* get Richard Moll, get Richard Moll, ohpleaseohpleaseohplease get Richard Moll...
I couldn't actually play B:AA, so perhaps I missed out on a lot of the game's much-lauded appeal. I was expecting a lot more from it, between the Holy Trinity of Conroy, Hamill, and Sorkin united under the usually-superior pen of Paul Dini, and the rave reviews all-around. Instead, I found the dialogue to be far beyond Dini's usual standard, with the Joker being not that funny and Harley sounded rather more like Grant Morrison's tone-deaf Squeaky Fromme take from that abysmal BATMAN (purple) prose issue. I was holding out hope, that maybe it was all going somewhere really awesome. And then, yeah, not really.
Maybe it was more fun to play than to watch. Either way, I felt like the only person to be rather disappointed by the game.
That said, the trailer fills me with giddy geek glee. Hamill's laugh STILL makes my heart go aflutter, especially the way it's done there. The hints at the other villains to be included also pleases me gr... oh fuck it, if you watched that, you know exactly why *I'm* excited:

On one hand, I'm nervous about how this game might cock-up the character. On the other...*fingers crossed* get Richard Moll, get Richard Moll, ohpleaseohpleaseohplease get Richard Moll...
no subject
Date: 2009-12-15 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-15 02:55 am (UTC)*joins in this chant*
no subject
Date: 2009-12-15 03:11 am (UTC)And, um, Mr. John, why does Joker look like something out of Spawn in that picture link? And is it ok that it scared me?
no subject
Date: 2009-12-15 05:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-15 07:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-18 01:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-18 03:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-18 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-18 06:12 am (UTC)And, I want to take the time to say that my videogame dislike does have its exceptions. I've truely enjoyed the experiences i've had with the X-men legends and marvel ultimate alliacnce games... and my former roommate jordan will be the first to tell you that the reason he has all of the alternate costumes in DOA 4 is because I spent a friday post midterms working off stress by spending several hours button mashing the hell out of some big boobed pugilists. Then again, fighting games and beat um ups have always been my forte, and it's been hard for video games to fuck them up.
also, is it sad or just kind of predictable that I am willing to sit through several hours of youtube videos to watch a full play through of the ghostbusters game so i can get the story with out bothering to buy a ps3?
no subject
Date: 2009-12-15 03:55 pm (UTC)I think this is the major reason why Arkham Asylum was so successful and Ghostbusters was not. Yes, Batman had great voice acting and dialogue and an interesting storyline, but it was the somewhat innovative and seamless game play that really made the game popular. Ghostbusters, on the other hand, had the voice acting and dialogue and something of a story, but the game play was atrocious. Or, at the very least, more frustrating than fun. So all of the atmosphere and ambiance of the game (which is what the storylines are, essentially) couldn't save it.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-15 08:53 pm (UTC)As fantastic as Hammil's Joker is, I find myself hoping they have a bit less of him this time around, if only to avoid retreading the first game. Also: any idea what the 'Sionis' sign means?
no subject
Date: 2009-12-16 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-18 06:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-19 07:40 pm (UTC)Plus, I still don't know how I feel about his action figure, which seems to be giving a thumbs up:
no subject
Date: 2009-12-18 01:13 am (UTC)You really had to play it. You were able to skulk around on gargoyle statues and watch henchmen freak out while you whittled down their ranks, and punching people has rarely felt so ... punchy. The whole thing just felt very Batmanny.
But yeah, Harley was particularly grating.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-18 01:23 am (UTC)But in this case, I really was banking on enjoyment from the plot/dialogue aspect. They just seemed to be a lock, damn it! Damn it. At rare times like this, I really do wish I had something other than a Wii.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-18 01:53 pm (UTC)