Link: The 32-Type Dating Test by OkCupid - Free Online Dating. My profile name: manchesterblack |
While I cop to the possibility of some of this, other parts (such as the always getting what I want and my being good at influencing others) I fear I must call bullshit on. Furthermore, I took the liberty of looking up what "The Playstation" kind of girl is.
Here's what I found. "The Playstation."
"You're a nice girl, and you have lots of sex. It's therefore highly likely that you're attractive, and you're certainly outgoing & friendly. Plus, this healthy physical attitude of yours indicates deeper emotional well-being and stability. Unheard of. When guys dare to dream, they dream of you.
You don't get attached too easily, and, to wit, you're not necessarily looking for something long-term right now. That's a bigger asset than you know. Though, physically speaking, you're open to anything, you're keeping your emotional side well-protected. This means there won't be a lot of wreckage to clean up whenever you decide to settle down.
In the meantime, the men you share yourself with actually respect you. Like them, you enjoy sex for its own sake and don't need any other validation for pleasure than pleasure itself. Hopefully, you have the good sense to blow off anyone who thinks less of you for that. Usually, this is the part of the description where we offer some life-correcting advice, but honestly, we can't think of anything about you we'd change. Keep on fucking, partner."
Ah. I see. So according to the people who made this test, "The Playstation" is the ideal role model. So apparently there's nothing wrong at all with fucking lots and lots of people without any emotional attachment. Aside from pregancy, STDs, and general ho-ness (I count men there too), let me ask, has anyone ever known a girl who fits the "Playstation" definition who isn't a crazed trainwreck psycho with self-image issues ranging from serious to holy-shit-watch-out? Since when does lots of fucking indicate a healthy emotional well-being?! Times like this I remember Dave's wonderful poem on so-called "Free Spirits."
Stupid memes. I blame Richards, as always.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 05:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 03:04 am (UTC)But to each his own... as the test says these girls shouldn't hook up with people that think less of them for their enjoyment of sex for its own sake, without emotional attachment. So judging from your reaction, I'd say the test did well to warn you against them. Not a good fit, to be sure.
I would disagree with alot of what the meme claims about you though; I think they fucked up on this one. You definitely are the uninhibited type and the spotlight's often on you, especially in the middle of a Hefner monologue! And alot of other things, the ones you mentioned yourself most blatantly, just don't fit.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 11:54 pm (UTC)