thehefner: (Harrumph)
[personal profile] thehefner
Why do I give a shit about the Oscars? Why can't I just write them off as the bullshit they so obviously are? Because I like seeing things that I consider to be good celebrated in a way that validates their quality and, subsequently, my own taste? Or is it just ingrained in me, like so many others, that the Oscars are the highest of holy events for Hollywood?

I mean, the Best Picture category is an annual source of fear and frustration, and this year is no different.

ATONEMENT
MICHAEL CLAYTON
JUNO
NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN
THERE WILL BE BLOOD

Now, I haven't seen ATONEMENT, but I know one person who adores it (having read the book) and a handful of people who viciously hate it enough to start their own mafia specifically designed to glower at this film. Nor have I seen MICHAEL CLAYTON, which made three of CHUD.com's 2007 lists: one "Best of 2007," and two "Worst of 2007." Take that how you will.

And then there's JUNO. By the way, I finally figured out what bugs me about JUNO! It's JOSS-WHEDON-Y! Oh, it's perfect! All is clear now! But yes, yes, I do enjoy the film, mainly now thanks to an essay in The Hater, which I wish was online. It was titled, "Why It's Okay to Love This Phony Movie."

All that said, I feel comfortable enough to say that if any of those above films beat NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN or THERE WILL BE BLOOD for Best Picture, I will eat my hat. And I like my hat, ladies and gentlemen. I want it on my head, not in my head, on the way to my stomach.

But the fact is, NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN is fucking violent, and its anti-conventional-storytelling will likely turn many voters off. And THERE WILL BE BLOOD... well, it's unique. It's a true original, and originality has a way of not winning Oscars.

Ah well. Perhaps the WGA strike will derail this Academy Awards too, having already proven the Golden Globes to be an inglorious vanity event without a big ceremony to dress things up.

The only thing I'd miss about not having a whole award show is that ONCE's Glen Hansard and Marketa Irglová wouldn't get to perform live. Yes, they're nominated for best song, which I knew they would be (I told them so, and they seemed to honestly think it wasn't going to happen). They deserve it.

(Although apparently the Irish fucking hate Glen Hansard. What's up with that?)

In the meantime, I'm gonna re-watch THERE WILL BE BLOOD and frequent the most gloriously ridiculous fansite in the world, www.idrinkyourmilkshake.com. Seriously, "I drink your milkshake," should be the next "Say hello to my little friend!" and "pwned!"

Date: 2008-01-22 05:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yancentric.livejournal.com
I was listening to the Howard Stern show on the way to work this morning and everyone on the show was debating between which two of the obvious choices should win: No Country or TWBB. I'd think that by the time this debate reaches the Stern show, completely disregarding all other entries, these two are no longer dark horses.

Date: 2008-01-22 06:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thehefner.livejournal.com
One hopes, but I dunno, the Academy have made some serious WTF choices in the past, so I'm not putting anything past them. Know what I mean? Not that I remember any off-hand, of course.

Date: 2008-01-22 06:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nymphgalatea.livejournal.com
Out of the Best Film catagory I've only seen No Country and Atonement, though I plan on seeing There Will Be Blood as soon as it comes out over here.

If Atonement wins I'm going to have to smite Hollywood, I'm afraid. And that's with my deep and abiding love for James McAvoy factored into the equation.

Also, if Cate Blanchett wins Best Actress for the dire sequel to Elizabeth, there will be yet more smiting. She was good in the first film. In the second...not so much. I found myself more interested in her clothes than in her performance.

Date: 2008-01-22 06:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thehefner.livejournal.com
I keep hearing that ELIZABETH II: ELECTRIC BOOGALLOO devoted far, far more time to costumes than script or acting. That said, I still want SWEENEY TODD to kick its ass in the costuming award.

Date: 2008-01-22 10:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nymphgalatea.livejournal.com
Yeah. The costumes were really quite astonishingly lovely. But Blanchett was clearly unenthusiastic.

Plus, the director totally fucked up re: the defeat of the Spanish Armada. Which is, y'know, just one of Britains' most decisive and important naval battles. It's the sort of real life historical event that even a ten year old with a camcorder from the 1980's and a bathtub full of plastic boats could make a spectacular cinematic masterpiece out of.

I may have had issues with this film that no one outside the UK could understand (cf. my views on Braveheart)

Date: 2008-01-22 11:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cisic.livejournal.com
It's totally a tough choice. The costumes for Elizabeth were stunning. But I always feel like period movies have a leg up when it comes to the awards for costume design. I did like the subtle inventiveness to the costumes for Sweeney. Except for Carter's hair, which was waay too obvious.

I liked Elizabeth II better than most people. It was not as good as the first one, but it had its merits. It was different in tone and style than the first one, but I felt like that choice was supported by the different station in which the lead character was in. The tone of the movie sort of matched its heroine. Clyde Owens was a huge letdown as Raleigh. Blanchett I felt was bold and daring and exciting to watch.

Date: 2008-01-22 11:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thehefner.livejournal.com
I want all the men's clothes from SWEENEY TODD. I want to dress like that every damn day. Although I'd need to invest in a dance belt or something.

Now that is sad that Clive was a letdown, because he's usually always solid. Blanchett usually is as well, and man oh man, how I wish she had been in CLOSER instead of Julia Roberts. She might well have made Anna sympathetic.

Date: 2008-01-22 09:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackolantern.livejournal.com
I think that the Golden Globes non-ceremony has proven that we don't need to give a shit about any awards ceremony again, ever, except for the Tonys, of course.

Date: 2008-01-22 10:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thehefner.livejournal.com
Exactly! Hopefully the Oscars will be the same.

Date: 2008-01-22 10:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ortugatay.livejournal.com
The Irish hate Glen? Really? Seemingly sweet, down to earth darling darlingest Glen?

Hmm. I wonder why.

Date: 2008-01-22 10:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thehefner.livejournal.com
Check out this interview:

http://www.avclub.com/content/feature/glen_hansard

And if ye be strong of mind and pure of heart, beware the comments section, for there be a vicious hive of scum and fucktardery so foul, so cruel, so obnoxious, and few have survived with their souls intact.

Can you browncoat a phrase?

Date: 2008-01-23 05:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] metalcrowe.livejournal.com
Seriously, "I drink your milkshake," should be the next "Say hello to my little friend!" and "pwned!"

I agree; and my evidence is that it is already bugging the hell out of me, just like those other phrases.

You sure as hell can

Date: 2008-01-23 05:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thehefner.livejournal.com
Crap! Must remember to use it more sparingly, lest it lose its mighty power.

September 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 05:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios