thehefner: (OMG SCREAM)
You may be asking yourself, "Say, , who wins at life and everything?"

The answer, my friends, is [livejournal.com profile] angrylemur:



If you don't get it, read my previous post and click on the various links.

And there you go, [livejournal.com profile] nymphgalatea and [livejournal.com profile] zhinxy. See you there for opening night in 2012. Now if you'll excuse me, I must go serve a dark and a hungry god. He craves Trader Joe's Oreos.
thehefner: (Doc Ock)
As a long-time BABYLON 5 fan, I was excited to finally, finally, check out the brand-new B5 direct-to-DVD movie THE LOST TALES.

...

I wish I could get my martinis to be that dry.

Sigh. I mean, lord knows J. Michael Straczynski has his hits and misses, and B5 was certainly indicative of that. Although after HEROES, I don't know if I could possibly defend B5's acting and writing often times were I to revisit the series today. Nonetheless, it earned a close place in my heart, especially when Sci-Fi was showing it back to back with FARSCAPE, which is still one of my favoritest favorite TV shows ever that I wish more people watched.

But man oh man, space opera on a low budget... geez. I feel like I just dragged my face on the ground for the past hour and a half.

I have hope that the next B5 movie (c'mon, Garibaldi and Mollari!) will be a marked improvement, but for a first effort... yipes. I've seen video game cutscenes with more life.



And to make matters worse, SWEENEY TODD is not doing well at the box office. Sure, I have my problems with the movie, and it's hardly matching my frustration of GRINDHOUSE's bombing. But I'm disappointed nonetheless.

Seriously, I don't get why some people hate musicals. Just blanket-hate all musicals, no matter the type (because all musicals are the same, clearly). I had hoped to maybe get some insight into this mindset by reading the reviews at fandango.com, but that was a little like repeatedly punching myself in the balls.

And I quote: "I love Johnny Depp and Tim Burton movies 1st of all. Great Cinematography, I like the story concept, but its a FREAKING MUSICAL! I mean literally there is about 5 minutes of TOTAL regular dialogue. Im sorry Im not into that Gone With The Wind sing-a-long hokey pokey. Singing is started for the moment the movie is started till the end....LITERALLY!"

Ugh. Message boards are vile hives of scum and villainy. You'd think I'd learn.

I just wanted a bit more appreciation for the form, and for Sondheim in particular. But it seems between the music and the gore (and oh, wow, is there ever gore, more than I was expecting) word of mouth is going to very much work against this film, in some respects.

Again, I have my problems with the film. But come on, that more people are flocking to NATIONAL TREASURE 2 and ALVIN AND THE CHIPMUNKS... you feel my pain on that count at least, right?



Ah well, at least SPIDER-MAN 2 is on TV. As long as I can muscle my way through the Kirsten Dunst scenes, I'll be golden.

After all, at times like this, you gotta do as Johnny Go says, and "Ac-Cent-Tchu-Ate the Positive."
thehefner: (Bill the Butcher: They Tuk Er Jerbs!)
So we're winding down to the end of the number "My Friends" and I'm starting to shift anxiously in my seat. Mom is eyeing me suspiciously as I tell myself, "don't do it, don't do it, don't do it," and the music swells. It's rising, higher, more triumphant, and I'm squirming even more, barely able to contain it bubbling up inside me. "Don't do it, don't do it, don't--!" And Johnny Depp rises like a reborn fiery angel of vengeance, proclaiming just as the music hits...: "At last... my arm is complete again!"

Me (swinging my arms in my theater seat, singing full blast): LIFT YOUR RAZOR HIIIIIGH, SWEE-NEY, HERE IT SINGING YESSSSS! SINK IT IN THE ROSY SKIN OF RIGHTEOUSNESSSSSS!!!!!!

... Erm... I was lucky the movie theatre's sound was blasted up high, or I might have been really embarassed.

Sorry, I just... well I missed the chorus, damn it! Seriously, between that and none of the patrons of Mrs. Lovett's pie shop singing "God that's good!" during the song "God that's good!", it's like Burton and company were like, "One person singing = good, two people singing = tolerable, more than that is FORBIDDEN!"

Other than that, I kinda fucking loved SWEENEY TODD.

And it's tricky, because you have to understand, I was a seriously recent and hardcore convert to the Angela Lansbury/George Hearn version (there entirety of which you can watch HERE), and wasn't sure if the movie would be able to live up to it, what with a cast of actors who--it seemed--couldn't really sing.

Well, can they? The answer is yes... in the context of the film.

With the exception of Toby, the singing alone is not all that great. Only the Hot Topic generation totally unfamiliar with the original show will likely snap up the soundtrack and lovingly listen to it on its own, not realizing that--relatively speaking--it's not that strong.

But when you combine the acting behind those vocal performances... and you combine Tim Burton's sumptuous visuals... and you throw in the extra sounds you wouldn't get in a stage version, the metal ring of blades, the scrape of silver against soft wet flesh... taken as a whole, it about evenly matches the seductive and awesome power of a great stage SWEENEY TODD.

While being two very different beasts. Apples and oranges, really.

And that's exactly how this should be viewed. Sondheim was right, it's not the stage version, but it's every bit as deserving of the title of SWEENEY TODD.

Burton hasn't made it his own, mind you. Perhaps if he'd has a bit more fun in some places (why so dour all the time, folks?!) it might well have been, but no, Angela Lansbury's legacy is well intact, thank you very much. It's not going to be the definitive version of SWEENEY TODD anymore than BEOWULF earlier this year will be the definitive version of that story either.

But let's talk actual Sweeneys. After watching the George Hearn version, listening to the original Len Cariou production, and seeing Johnny Depp, I'm going to have to say that Hearn is my favorite. It's hard to compare Cariou on voice alone, so I'm willing to grant that on stage he had a lot more going on, but Hearn had far more passion and anguish.

That's the thing that bugged me about Depp's performance. Look, he was excellent, he was intense, he was powerful... but look back at Hearn's performance. What struck me most about Hearn was that this was a man who was constantly and forever hurting, whereas Depp's Sweeney seems to have lost his humanity long ago. He spends the entire film glowering, rarely showing any of that humanity, and even at the end, when he should be feeling utter anguish... he almost just seems to deadpannedly accept it all and inevitable.

Depp is all burning revenge without the pain that spurred it forth, and while it's mostly exciting to watch (and it worked beautifully in the "By the Sea" number), it's not exactly sympathetic. Sure, you could have a Sweeney who's lost his humanity, but would you really want to if given the choice?

Also, Timothy Spall, known to many here as "Peter Pettigrew" (the things I do to try to connect with my audience, oy), who played Beadle Bamford. The man is a grotesque work of art. Seriously, was anybody else, like, totally transfixed every second he was on screen? That limp hair, that toothy evil grin, the complete and utter absence of a neck, that sliding cane, that entire awesome outfit... and every move he made, it was like he was dancing. His arms were always free, his knees always bent to the side like an elegant and well-fed spider, or perhaps a tick. His very presence was just dazzling in a sleazy gross vile sort of way.

I want their coats. All of their coats. Hats, too. Cravats, while you're at it. I want. Now. Give me dem.

No, you know what I want? Between this and GANGS OF NEW YORK, I want my entire world to be designed by Dante Ferretti. Make this happen. Doom commands it.

Oh, and one more note about the actual singing abilities of the cast: they were good, in the context of the film. On stage, they'd be totally "meh," by and large, but their acting absolutely made up for it. Take the young actor who played Toby, on the other hand: he had an EXCELLENT and powerful singing voice, one that threatened to drown out Carter's weak little thing during "Not While I'm Around," and yet he couldn't act worth shit. So there you go. I still prefer Neil Patrick Harris. But I did like what they did with Toby at the end.

So in summation, I know some people are like, "ew, another dark Tim Burton movie where Johnny Depp is gaunt and weird and Helena Bonham Carter uses up precious oxygen, wah wah wah," yes, those people are out there. But seriously, flaws aside (and mainly, those are just criticisms from a lover of the stage version--one might read as "the REAL version" if you so desired--this truly is the most sumptuous film Burton's made since SLEEPY HOLLOW, and his best since ED WOOD.



Once again, if you wanna see the celebrating classic Lansbury/Hearn version it's all up here for free. Just, y'know, you'd like to see a version with people who can actually really sing.
thehefner: (Joker: sigh!)
So, be warned and prepared, fans of SWEENEY TODD: all of the chorus songs (including the classic opening/closing "Ballad of Sweeney Todd") have been cut from the film. The opening credits just plays the instrumental of "Ballad" and Burton had filmed all the dead characters at the end singing it, but decided that it didn't fit the tone of the ending as they'd filmed it, so perhaps expect to see that on the DVD? I don't see why we couldn't have at least had it playing over the credits, but whatever. Kinda lame.

Also, the theme I keep hearing is that Helena Bonham-Carter's voice is weak as water, but her acting is fantastic. I suppose that is the more important aspect, at least in a movie version.

So, yeah, I think it's best to be prepared for such things, as we snobs try to appreciate Burton's film for what it is. Which is, according to multiple sources, his best film since ED WOOD. I mean, in terms of substance and quality, not just fun and beautiful spectacle (SLEEPY HOLLOW has its supporters).



Hey, [livejournal.com profile] adaptor, we watched ARMY OF SHADOWS. Fascinating movie, if only due to how little of that world we Yanks ever really hear about. [livejournal.com profile] fiveseconddelay would call it a "Hefner-paced" movie, but really, without an Ennio Morricone soundtrack, it really did drag for us at times. But speaking as someone who often has serious issues with French cinema, it was a great film, but not one I shall likely be revisiting unless I need to research the era.



And finally: sometimes, Europe (the continent, not the band) sometimes gets better versions of movie posters than we do. Such is the case with THE DARK KNIGHT.

Namely, this badass one of the Joker and this one that CHUD.com observed looks like Batman has been grounded and is looking out of his window longingly.

Cannot wait to see this. Cannot wait. One way or another, Bloo, we're totally seeing this together.
thehefner: (Bub and Johnny Go)
Seems Don Rickles is performing in Atlantic City this January.

I think that seeing him before he dies is a moral imperative. For Johnny Go, you understand.



So further SWEENEY TODD thoughts...

First, here's a review of Tim Burton's SWEENEY TODD, reviewed by a Sondheim-fan theatre geek. Sounds about what I was hoping to expect. Basically, we just need to appreciate it not just for what it is, but as a different beast entirely. I look forward to it more than ever.

(don't read the comments afterward, though: your brain will melt from the loudmouthed asshattery of internet message boards)

I just watched 2001's SWEENEY TODD IN CONCERT, which is my second exposure to the show. I think I generally still prefer the 1982 version (the entirety of both of which are on YouTube), but the 2001 version was superior, in some respects. It definitely had the better Joanna, IMO, but the Perelli was lacking, clearly a singer more than an actor. The 2001 also had a postmodern snarky quality that was very fun, as opposed to the very earnest 1982 version. Also, Neil Patrick Harris.

George Hearn was still great in 2001, and it's always fascinating hearing how male singing voices can mature and develop, but I think I prefer the raw passion of the 1982 younger Hearn. That's gonna be the hardest thing about the adjustment to Johnny Depp: moving away from operatic fire and into sullen brooding.

Angela Lansbury and Patti LuPone... well, comparing the two is just apples and oranges. Very different takes on the characters, both of them excellent. Lansbury seemed more innocent, in her twisted way, more like a little girl, while LuPone struck me as more seen-it-all, down-to-earth, cynical, sensible, and mature, with a heart of gold... of sorts. I've known some Rudes like her.

Oh, and Judge Turpin 2001 really, really, really, really, really looked like Vigo the Carpathian from GHOSTBUSTERS II. Just sayin'.

So yeah, very much looking forward to the film now, and trying to keep an open mind. In the meantime, I must continue to suppress the urge to run up to customers in the comic store and belt "THEY ALLLLLLLLL DESERVE TO DIE! TELL YA WHY, MRS. LOVETT, TELL YA WHY!"
thehefner: (Bill the Butcher: Chillin' like a Villai)
On the Danny Elfman fans' LJ community recently, some folks were lamenting Elfman's lack of involvement in SWEENEY TODD. They were wondering why oh why Danny wasn't scoring the film? Did he have a falling out with Burton again?

...

When I pointed out that it was a, y'know, established musical by Stephen fucking SONDHEIM, they responded with shock and surprise. "Really?!" Many never heard of it. Nonetheless, one person still wished Elfman were involved somehow.

Now, y'all know that I worship Elfman's music, but... it... they... *headdesk*

In fairness, the trailer does its best to disguise the fact that it's a musical, and until yesterday, I had never actually seen SWEENEY TODD. Which I did, thanks to Netflix: the 1982 stage performance starring George Hearn and Angela Lansbury.

The entirety of which is here on YouTube:



Oh.

Oh. Wow.

Now, there's also a recording of SWEENEY TODD IN CONCERT from 2001, with George Hearn reprising the title role (he doesn't need the old-man makeup anymore!) with Patti LuPone and Neil Patrick Harris... the entirety of which is also on YouTube:



... all of which I have not yet seen, but plan to. LuPone's gonna have to work to erase the memory of Lansbury's Tony-winning performance, but she's more than earned the fair shot, from what little I know of her.

Umm. Yeah, folks, if y'all have a few hours to kill, uh, do yourself a favor and watch either of these, if you're totally unfamilar with SWEENEY TODD.

So with these in mind, I can only wonder what the hell Tim Burton is gonna do with the movie. Will audiences respond to it? Fuck if I know. The subject matter alone will likely turn many people off, and Sondheim is... not the most accessible musical scribe, shall we say?

I mean, shows like SWEENEY TODD and SUNDAY IN THE PARK WITH GEORGE aren't so much musicals as they are operettas. And even then, unlike operas with arias, there're very few hum-able melodies in Sondheim shows. They're more like plays written 90% in melodic recitative (recitative usually being my very least favorite part of opera).

And then there's the cast.

I am not at all worried about Sacha Baron Cohen as Perelli, Alan Rickman as Judge Turpin, or Timothy Spall as Beadle Bamford. I mean, it'll be interesting seeing Rickman actually play lecherous*, but otherwise, they'll be fantastic, I have no doubt. Cohen especially should be an absolute blast; watch the 1982 version, and the second Perelli shows up, you'll be like "Oh fuck, it's Borat."

No, the main worries are Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter. With the latter, I honestly have no idea what to expect, but with the former... well, he's not a singer. Not an opera singer, anyway. But he doesn't need to be, of course. We live in a day and age of mics, where non-opera singers with weak voices can perform LA BOHEME on Broadway, and perhaps non-operatic voices would be work just fine, perhaps even better, in film.

Even then, though, it seems Depp's not really singing, but more like that "sing-talking" thing. Which also might work, if done well. One thing I noticed about George Hearn's performance was how tortured he seemed, whereas Depp in the trailer appears to be more outright sinister and devilish.

All in all, I'm more interested than ever to see the film. I just hope Burton doesn't forget to imbue some heart and humanity in the proceedings, which I felt were sorely lacking from his faithful-but-cold CHARLIE AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY.

In the meantime, I'm just gonna watch SWEENEY TODD IN CONCERT and swoon.

(side-note: it looks like in 2008 there'll be a Broadway revival of SUNDAY IN THE PARK WITH GEORGE. I'm sorely tempted to make the trek, even though the original Mandy Patinkin/Bernadette Peters recording is one of my very favorite films of all time)


*is he anything less than delightfully unpleasant in real life? I think he'd be even less fun to hang out with than John Cleese.

September 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 15th, 2025 12:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios